The Baptism of Naaman – 2 Kings 5:1-19

Naaman was the commander of the Syrian army that had just conquered Israel. Following this, he came down with leprosy, a disease generally reserved for those under the curse of God. Israelites reading this story would have generally approved of this situation, but the slave girl, whose family was likely killed by Naaman and his army, felt differently and pointed him towards the prophet Elisha.

At this point, Naaman has some choices to make. Does he trust this girl? Does he trust Israel? Does he trust the God of Israel? What is he willing to do in order to live. He decides to try, and off he goes to the monk wizard hermit. He stops off at the king of Israel to request healing, and the king freaks out. Here is the man who just conquered the nation asking for something impossible. “Am I God, that I can kill and bring back to life?” he demands. This notion of resurrection is a key to the implications of the story.

Ultimately, though, Elisha invites Naaman to come be healed. When he shows up, though, things do not go as planned. Elisha sends a servant out to tell Naaman to dunk himself in the (filthy, muddy) Jordan River seven times. Not six, not eight. Five is right out. Naaman badly. He wanted a “sexy salvation” but this seemed shameful and offended his pride.

Once again, though the servants step in and persuade him to put aside his pride. So, Naaman goes under – in the Greek, the baptism of Naaman is the first reference to baptism in scripture. On the seventh dip, he is reborn – both physically and spiritually. He does still hang on to his pride enough to attempt to pay for the healing and earn it retroactively. But he is denied.

Instead, Naaman takes a load of dirt in order to take some of the land of Jehovah in order to retain that connection. His faith in healing had turned into a faith in God Himself.

The point of this story is not that some guy got healed. It’s not that the Jordan River is magic. It’s that God gives grace to the most unlikely people in the most unlikely ways. God’s ultimate goal for us is not just to be healed or forgiven, but to have a connection of love with us, a worshipful relationship of creation and creator.

This story calls forward to the resurrection, the death, burial and coming to life of Christ. Unlike Naaman, Christ died not for his sins, but ours. We, like Naaman, are enemies of God, and yet Christ died and rose again for us. What did Naaman have to do in order to receive healing and forgiveness? Essentially, he had to believe and trust the prescription of God.

This is what we demonstrate and act out in baptism. It represents the death and resurrection of Christ, and our own death and resurrection in Him. It also represents the cleansing of our sin by the forgiveness of God.

Some of us may have barriers to this. We may not see a need for baptism or even for Jesus himself. We may be skeptical about the whole God, Christ and salvation story.

Regardless of where you are, though, God is calling you to connect to that story through faith in Him and baptism. He wants to forgive your sins, change your heart and enter into an eternal relationship with you.

– Sermon Notes, Brent Rood, Seed Church, Lynnwood, WA, Easter Sunday 2017

2 Kings 5:1-19
Something went wrong with the bible. Please make sure that you are requesting a valid passage! If this problem presits please contact joshuawiecorek@outlook.com

Genesis as Rebuke

The first chapter of the Bible these days gets swept up into debates about evolution, science, etc. But how was it understood by the ancient Israelites when it was written? Why did they consider it important enough to be written down?

It is notable that God calls two things good that the ancient Israelites would generally not have considered to be good, but rather terrifying. Darkness and the abyss of the sea were both symbols of evil, danger and chaos, but God calls them “good” when he places them in their appropriate contexts and within their appropriate boundaries.

Another note – vegetation was created before the sun, which may seem strange. But keep in mind that the Israelites knew very well that the sun was required for plants to grow. This order was purposeful, and the contradiction was purposeful.

Later, man was created – in the image of God. This is in stark contrast to how surrounding cultures saw man. The image of God (or rather, of the gods) was restricted to rulers. The Israelites, though, put the basis for equality and democracy right in their own “founding document.”

The book of Genesis may have been formalized, compiled from oral tradition and other written accounts, during the Babylonian exile. If that is the case, this chapter would have served at least in part as a rebuke to the Babylonian creation account, in which Marduk tears apart the body of Tiamat in order to create the world.

The Genesis creation account puts forth two bold statements that go after the theology of the cultures around them. First, there is one God, not many. Second, the creation of the Earth did not happen in the midst of war and conflict, but was rather a purely good act of creative construction.

The counterintuitive order of creation may also have had something to do with this. The sun gods of the era were vital because of the importance of sun for crops, yet here Israel says “no, in the end even the sun is subservient to the creator God, and if He wants plants, he gets plants, and the sun is irrelevant.”

So how does this creation account impact our own relationship with the culture around us? Regardless of how you interpret the specifics of the passage, we all should take from this passage the understanding of the one God as the creator of heaven and earth. How does this understanding of a creator God set us apart from those with their own creation stories, their own gods of science and chance?

–Sermon Notes, Dave Lester, Seed Church, Lynnwood, WA

Genesis 1

Something went wrong with the bible. Please make sure that you are requesting a valid passage! If this problem presits please contact joshuawiecorek@outlook.com